Post by shahadat650 on May 18, 2024 4:48:21 GMT
Update. In July 2008, Regulation No. 1 was issued, which unified the main existing rules and made the application of these systems more clear and objective. One of the main changes of this new decree is the creation of three new categories of electronic time control. They are: – traditional point registration; – sets of equipment and computer programs for recording working hours; – electronic time recording system through a program, including a marker collector, a time record storage and a time processing program. In all these models, companies need to follow some rules to ensure their safe use. Look: the system is available in the workplace; allows the identification of the employer and the employee; enables the extraction of a faithful record of the appointments made by the employee in electronic and printed form; does not allow restrictions on point marking; does not mark points automatically; does not require prior authorization to schedule overtime; does not allow the modification or deletion of employee recorded data.
To learn more about the law of time control, watch the video below. The Electronic Points Law in the Public Service The Man Who Strikes the Judge's Gavel One of the most common questions about the control of working hours in public servants is whether civil servants need to punch a clock in. The answer to this question is: yes. The reason for this confusion is that, according to the provisions of the law, we only associate the point of compulsion with private companies. Moreover, since civil servants are a distinct class among ordinary workers and have their own legal system, guided b South Korea Phone Number y regulations, there are differences between these classes in terms of the relevant rights provided for by the collective contract law. Another point that needs to be clarified is that the law provides three options for time control: manual, mechanical and electronic systems. Among these options, public institutions usually control working hours through a manual system, i.e. a timetable or a timetable, in accordance with the provisions of the law.
However, the emergence of Bill No. 1 was to establish electronic attendance control for all civil servants within the Federation. The use of electronic time-tracking was charged by the Federal Court of Audit to federal universities and university hospitals to replace manual stitching, considered to be flawed and outdated. Today, it is awaiting analysis by the Constitutional, Judicial and Civic Commission. The major change in the system of time control for public officials was accompanied by cases of time fraud reported in the media and the losses these frauds caused to the state treasury. In addition to the problem of fraud, manual time tracking also poses administrative difficulties, as HR managers often waste days closing payrolls on servers. However, with so many options on the market, how to choose which model to use still causes great doubts in the industry. The best solutions on the market are single-point applications, because they can meet all the needs of a company, whether it is a private or public company.
To learn more about the law of time control, watch the video below. The Electronic Points Law in the Public Service The Man Who Strikes the Judge's Gavel One of the most common questions about the control of working hours in public servants is whether civil servants need to punch a clock in. The answer to this question is: yes. The reason for this confusion is that, according to the provisions of the law, we only associate the point of compulsion with private companies. Moreover, since civil servants are a distinct class among ordinary workers and have their own legal system, guided b South Korea Phone Number y regulations, there are differences between these classes in terms of the relevant rights provided for by the collective contract law. Another point that needs to be clarified is that the law provides three options for time control: manual, mechanical and electronic systems. Among these options, public institutions usually control working hours through a manual system, i.e. a timetable or a timetable, in accordance with the provisions of the law.
However, the emergence of Bill No. 1 was to establish electronic attendance control for all civil servants within the Federation. The use of electronic time-tracking was charged by the Federal Court of Audit to federal universities and university hospitals to replace manual stitching, considered to be flawed and outdated. Today, it is awaiting analysis by the Constitutional, Judicial and Civic Commission. The major change in the system of time control for public officials was accompanied by cases of time fraud reported in the media and the losses these frauds caused to the state treasury. In addition to the problem of fraud, manual time tracking also poses administrative difficulties, as HR managers often waste days closing payrolls on servers. However, with so many options on the market, how to choose which model to use still causes great doubts in the industry. The best solutions on the market are single-point applications, because they can meet all the needs of a company, whether it is a private or public company.